|
|
|
|
28th Jamadi-ul-Saani, 1433 | Monday, May 21, 2012
Featured News

Ahmadiyya Movement in, or against, Islam?

Saturday, 26 November 2011
Comments(9)
November 26:

The "Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam" (called by Muslims everywhere as "Qadianism") was established, in 1889, by Mirza Ghulam Qadiani (1835 - 1908) in a small Punjabi village of India. Mirza Ghulam Qadiani’s family were in the service of the British colonial powers and, to his dying days, Mirza Ghulam openly declared his allegiance to the British imperialism. In fact, the culmination of his service to foreign power was his declaration that resistance to oppressors (Jihad) -- as ordained in the Holy Quran by God -- had become unIslamic!

Mirza Ghulam Qadiani’s life was laden with contradictory and anti-Islamic claims. In 1880, he declared himself to be only a Muslim writer; in 1885, he announced he was a revivalist (Mujaddid); in 1891, he claimed to be the Promised Mehdi and the Promised Messiah; and in 1901, he pronounced himself a prophet of God! Facing an open and strong opposition by Muslim Scholars and religious leaders for this blasphemous declaration and other teachings which belittled Jesus Christ(pbuh) and contradicted the Quranic revelations, he also announced that he was the second and improved coming of the Prophet Muhammad(SAW) with authority to reinterpret the Holy Quran at his pleasure! Not happy with mere prophethood, in 1904, he declared himself the Krishna (the Hindu Lord). Obviously, like an unethical modern-day politician, he was trying to appeal to all uneducated segments of the public in India!

Fortunately, the Almighty Allah(SWT), time and time again, exposed Mirza Ghulam Qadiani's falsehood through his own statements and so-called prophecies. Even many of his own family members were aware of his treachery and openly opposed his anti-Islamic teachings. Mirza Ghulam Qadiani finally died by intervention of the Almighty Allah and as the result of religious prayer challenges (Mubahala), in 1908.

Since the death of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani, his heirs -- the leaders of the Qadiani organization ("Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam") -- have been extremely busy trying to clean up his image. Backed by seemingly unlimited support they receive from their anti-Muslim allies, they have been promoting falsehood and deception through the media. They have even resorted to removing some of most controversial writings of Qadiani leadership -- which had become a source of embarrassment to them -- from circulation. Their partial English translation of their original text has been heavily edited to exclude all controversial and anti-Islamic sayings of their cult leaders. Obviously, they themselves realize the true nature of their "Ahmadiyya Mission".

The goal of the "Ahmadiyya Mission" is, and has always been, to confuse uninformed Muslims, divide the Ummah, prevent resistance to oppressors (Jihad), and provide an alternative to non-Muslims who find the message of Islam appealing. Quite cunningly, they do so by using Islamic terminology and teachings, and hiding the controversial writings of their founders. Today, only the most learned Muslims are able to attend one of their functions and realize that their brand of Islam is a form of Kufr (disbelief). Even when their leaders mention the Kalima (I bear witness there is only one God and Muhammad is his messenger), they are referring to their founder who proclaimed himself to be (God forbid) the second improved coming of the prophet Muhammad(SAW) and not to the true Prophet(SAW) of Allah(SWT).

Muslim brethren everywhere should not be confused by Qadiani leadership's superficial use of Islamic concepts to promote their cult. Our beloved Prophet Muhammad(SAW) and the four Khalifah also faced such false prophets. Of particular interest is the claim by an Arab, named Musailama, to prophethood, during the latter part of the life of the Prophet(SAW). Although he simply claimed co-prophethood with the Prophet Muhammad(SAW) of Arabia and did not belie any other teaching of the Holy Quran, he and all of his mislead followers were declared out of the fold of Islam, by righteous believers. Under the leadership of Hadrat Abu Bakr Siddique(RA) and with the unanimous consensus of all the companions of the Prophet Muhammad(SAW), a victorious war was waged against Musailama for using Islamic concepts and claiming prophethood. This should indeed be sufficient evidence to declare the Qadianis as non-Muslims.

In 1974, after an exhaustive examination of all the evidence presented for and against the Qadianis, the Muslim World League (Rabita Alame Islami) -- which represents all religious scholars from every Muslim country of the world  -- passed an unanimous resolution declaring the Qadiani Movement and its leadership out of the fold of Islam. Indeed, "Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam" is a man-made organization with no divine authority or guidance.

Say: "O ye men! Now Truth hath reached you from your Lord! those who receive guidance, do so for the good of their own souls; those who stray, do so to their own loss: and I am not (set) over you to arrange your affairs."

(The Holy Quran, Yunus, 10:108)

May Allah(SWT) expose the falsehood of the Qadiani leadership and show its unfortunate followers the path to the perfected and completed religion of Allah: Al-Islam

Courtesy: tauheed-sunnat.com

Latest News

Related News

Qadianiyat is a messianic

Qadianiyat is a messianic cult and has nothing to do with Islam

Sadly, much of Islam is

Sadly, much of Islam is still living in a pre-modern world where religious violence is often acceptable and tolerance is a dirty word associated with corrupt western values . Violent campaign against Ahmadiyya is one of the acceptable manifests.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wanted to return Islam to what he saw as its original spiritual purity. He did not accept the later reinterpretations of the Koran, and he rejected the idea of jihad as a physical religious obligation and tool of expansion, but confined it to the idea of self-improvement. He committed his movement to conciliation and reaching out to other religions, instead of confronting them or proselytizing

Sunnat

Asmk bhaiyo agar duniya aur aaqeerat me kamyab hona hai to allah ke hukum pe chalna hai aur nabi mohammad sallallahualaiwasallam ke har tareeqe pe zindagi guzarna hai..hamare sar ke baal se leke pair ke naaqun tak sab nabi ke tareqe par hona chaiye aur hamari zindagi jhule se leke dole tak nabike tareqe pe hona zaruri hai tab hi hamari kamyabi hai...

The Difference

I am glad you ask that question, in my humble way let me try and answer this. As a human being we are fallible, full of mistakes and it is generally accepted not just by Islam but by all religions that God Almighty is infallible. If we make mistakes and admit to it, make amends, correct it, it's considered a good thing to do so. Further as we are shortsighted in our vision of the future, as only God would know about the future, He would guide His prophet (pbuh) rightly about it. Hence a saying by a Prophet is generally accepted to be true and it is a further solidified truth if it is said to be an inspiration directly from God.

This is why a correction, amendment, removal of words or statements of one claiming to be a prophet is far more serious. It brings into question the very validity of their claim to divinity. The very essence of their message is then called into question. So the big question then is if this person was true, why is there a need to hide, amend or correct his statements. The answer would be very clear then.

This my friend is the difference. Between Jamaat and Deoband making a claim, removing amending and correcting their statements and the Qadiani movement doing so. The Jamaat or Deoband do not claim to be infallible, but students of the rightly guided Prophet (pbuh). When the qadiani movement does so, When the qadiani movement does so, it just lays bare their falsehood. The falsehood of their very founder is exposed.

Against Islam and its teachings

All the new sects of late eighteen century were formed by the Gora and Gori worst to core younger brother of Europe, be it in Iran, Afghanistan,Punjab in undivided India or other parts of the world, and still fomenting troubles in all Muslims lands with one reason or other, he is worst to worst and snake, and the current sect which is ruling Riyadh in the name of Sharia, pure Islam and what not is the product of this younger Gora.
It is as if Islam has no body to take care after the sad demise of the holy blessed Prophet, and all of a sudden a tom comes from Kharaj and did all the cleaning up work, the worst part is that he is trained by Gora late Humphrey, not in Holy Makkaha or Holy Medina, but in Cairo, read the books and find the truth, just praying with out questioning is like tame animals of circus, since the holy month and a month of sadness is coming Jahil to core Wahhabi will start again playing old and out dated HMV records with no result at all.

Even Jamaat Tableegh and the

Even Jamaat Tableegh and the School of Deoband removes their controversial writings ... so what's the big deal ...

So True Brother

I Totally Agree with you Brother.

The Big difference

I am glad you ask that question, in my humble way let me try and answer this. As a human being we are fallible, full of mistakes and it is generally accepted not just by Islam but by all religions that God Almighty is infallible. If we make mistakes and admit to it, make amends, correct it, it's considered a good thing to do so. Further as we are shortsighted in our vision of the future, as only God would truly know about the future, He would guide His prophet (pbuh) rightly about it. Hence a saying by a Prophet is generally accepted to be true and it is a further solidified truth if it is said to be an inspiration directly from God.

This is why a correction, amendment, removal of words or statements of one claiming to be a prophet is a far more serious act. It brings into question the very validity of their claim to divinity. The very essence of their message is then called into question. So the big question then is if this person was true, why is there a need to hide, amend or correct his statements? The answer is evidently very clear then.

This my friend is the difference. Between Jamaat and Deoband making a claim, removing amending and correcting their statements and the Qadiani movement doing so. The Jamaat or Deoband do not claim to be infallible, but students of the rightly guided Prophet (pbuh). When the qadiani movement does so, it just lays bare their falsehood. The falsehood of their very founder is exposed.

Sunni muslim

You stupid stop believing in your so called qadiani mullah prophet Muhammad was d last messenger if Allah u idiot fool kuffar he'll on u for sure

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

Opinion Poll
Do you think Rajya Sabha is crowded with celebrities?
YesNoCan't say


Rs. 28910 (Per 10g)
Comments >>

Matrimony | Photos | Videos | Search | Polls | Archives | Advertise | Letters | Muslim Names

© The Siasat Daily, 2012. All rights reserved.
Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Abids, Hyderabad - 500001, AP, India
Tel: +91-40-24744180, Fax: +91-40-24603188
[email protected]