Tuesday , July 25 2017
Home / Islamic Hub / DIALOGUE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN ISLAM – (PART 2)

DIALOGUE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN ISLAM – (PART 2)

In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.

“Islam offers dialogue as the just and sure way of resolving conflicts!”

LEVELS OF DIALOGUE:

Islam has instituted dialogue at all levels of human relationship. The purpose is to give everyone concerned a right to have a say in the issue at hand and for all to benefit from the wisdom, foresight and experiences of the parties involved. This will ensure peace and stability and provide the people with a sense of worth and belonging.

At the intra-family level, where the man is supposed to be the leader, Islam has made consultation the norm for running of affairs of the family. Even on trivial issues such as weaning a baby, it insists that it should be based on consultation and mutual consent. In Surah al-Baqara, Allah says:

“If they both (husband and wife) decide on weaning by mutual consent and after due consultation, there is no sin on them.”
(2:233)

Similarly, Islam recommends consultation as the way of solving inter-family disputes. A rift within a family can affect other families, as it is likely to draw the respective families of husband and the wife into the disagreement. In this situation, Islam recommends:

“If you fear a breach between them twain (the man and his wife) appoint (two) arbitrators, one from his family and the other from hers, if they both wish for peace, Allah will cause their reconciliation.”
(4:35).

At community and national levels, Islam is perhaps the first social system to institute consultation as an integral part of political process and to formally incorporate it into its system. The institution of al-Shura is enshrined in the noble Qur’an and it has been practiced since the rise of the first Islamic state in al-Madinah. To emphasize its importance, a whole surah is named after it. In this surah, we read the following attributes of the believers:

“Those who avoid the greater sins and illegal sexual intercourse, and when they are angry, they forgive. And those who answer the call of their Lord and establish prayer and who (conduct) their affairs by mutual consultation, and who spend what we have bestowed on them.”
(42:37-38).

In Islam dialogue applies to all situations of life and is found at all levels of human relation. It is not restricted to conflict resolution alone, and this is why Islam can claim to be truly a religion of dialogue. And this is not an empty slogan or a declaration on paper, but it is a principle which has been adhered to and practised throughout the history of Islam. As will be seen later, Islamic history is replete with instances where fair and constructive dialogue was preferred by Muslim leaders. In fact, this is a rule in Islam, that armed conflict would not be restored to until avenues of peace are exhausted. The guiding principle in this respect is the following divine command:

“But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it.”
(8:61).

DIALOGUE IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION:

Islam’s view of war is that it is a necessary evil to be resorted to only when it is absolutely unavoidable. The purpose of war in Islam is the establishment of peace and freedom, if those can be achieved without resorting to war, then there is no need for war. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said in a hadith:

“O people! Do not wish for an encounter with the enemy. Pray to Allah to grant you security; but when you (have to) encounter them, exercise patience.”
[al-Bukhari, 1985].

Therefore, Islam makes provisions for avoiding war, minimizing its effects if it unavoidably occurs and ending it as soon as possible. These provisions are based on agreement between Muslims and their enemy to be strictly adhered to by both sides. Islam seriously warns its followers against breaking agreements or acting in a treacherous manner towards their enemy. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said:

‘No people would break a treaty except that Allah has made their enemy to prevail over them’
[Imam Malik, n.d.].

One of the said provisions is amaan, or protection, which is the suspension of the legality to kill an enemy, enslave him or take his property. The purpose of amaan is to make possible dialogue between warring nations and enhance communication by allowing a free flow of ideas and views (Labdo, 1998). This provision will offer warring sides an opportunity to interact in an atmosphere of mutual trust, talk to each other and, hopefully, reach a peaceful settlement of their dispute.

Another provision is isti’maan, asylum, which is the act of guaranteeing the safety of an individual from a hostile country to enter Muslim territory for a purpose after which he is to return to his country, on the condition that he remains subject to Islamic rule for the duration of his stay. The difference between amaan and isti’maan is that the former can be granted to a number of people or to an entire population in their own land, while the latter is given only to individuals with stipulation that they remain in the Islamic territory.

Sulh, or peace treaty, is another avenue for peace created by Islam in order to give a chance for negotiation and dialogue for peaceful resolution of conflicts. It means an agreement reached between warring factions for peace either permanently or for a very long period. All people under the above three categories of agreements are guaranteed freedom of faith and protection of their lives, honour and property.

Even after the start of a war, Islam leaves wide-open channels for negotiation and eventual peace. The provision of muhadanah, or truce, is meant to serve this purpose. Muhadanah is an agreement reached between Muslims and their enemy to cease hostilities for a short period of time after the battle has already begun. This measure is designed to afford the two sides opportunity to take stock of the war and re-examine their options and priorities. It is also an open invitation to the warring parties to sit around the negotiating table and try to resolve their differences through dialogue and fair arguments.

Examples abound in Islamic history where these principles were put to good use thereby saving lives and avoiding the catastrophe of war.

Even before the dawn of his prophetic mission, Muhammad, peace be upon him, had displayed great diplomatic ability and capacity to resolve disputes peacefully and affect reconciliation between mutually antagonistic people. A notable example is the serious dispute which broke out between Arab chieftains when the Quraish leaders rebuilt the holy sanctuary of Ka’aba. The dispute arose as a result of disagreement on whom among the Arab tribal leaders would have the honour of putting the black stone (Hajar al-Aswad) in its place. The dispute was so serious that war seemed imminent. The Prophet, who was then a young man of 35, was able to solve this stalemate to the satisfaction of all when he placed the stone on his garment and asked each tribal leader to hold a tip of the garment and they carried it together. On reaching its designated location, he lifted the stone with his own hands and put it in place. Thus, he cleared a potentially explosive situation which could have degenerated into a bloody war with devastating consequences (Ibn Kathir, n.d.).

Another important example is the famous treaty of Hudaibiyyah, in the 6th year after Hijra. The Prophet had gone to Makkah with his companions intending to perform Umrah (the lesser Hajj). Makkan authorities thought that he had come to conquer the city and they made preparations for war. Tempers flared when the Muslims realized that the pagan Quraish leaders would not allow them to enter the city and observe their rites. There were heated negotiations which resulted in a treaty that was unfair to Muslims because it imposed unfavourable conditions on them. Tensions rose high and danger was imminent but for the great restraint and statesmanship showed by the Prophet who was able to persuade the Muslims to accept the treaty. This treaty later proved to be a great victory for Islam (Ibn Kathir, n.d.).

Successive generations of Muslim leaders followed the Prophets’ example. This became an established norm and was incorporated into the Shari’ah. Throughout Islamic history, beginning with the time of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, through the middle ages and down to the modern era, Muslims consistently championed the cause of peace and opposed military adventure. They always preferred negotiations and peaceful settlement of disputes.

CONCLUSION:

Humanity is in spiritual poverty today. Mankind has attained the highest level of material progress but we are bankrupt spiritually. We are civilized, yes, but yet we are primitive and barbaric. This is why the 20th century which saw the greatest achievements in science, technology and material well-being also witnessed the bloodiest conflicts in human history. Secular philosophies, ideologies and social systems have failed mankind. Today, men have no peace or happiness.

For the above reason, sensible men and women all over the world are turning their backs on secularism and looking for some form of spirituality. Even in the United States, the bastion of unbelief, social philosophers like Francis Fukuyama, are calling for a return to spiritual values. The need for spirituality is felt more in the sphere of war and armament where the “Godless man” has become baser than beast, destroying human life, animal and plant life, the environment and indeed threatening to put an end to life on this planet. In the new world order of petty tribal wars (Africa), ethnic cleansing (Europe) and sheer arrogance and Godlessness (America), men have no refuge but to hold fast to the rope of Allah.

Islam, which means peace, offers an alternative to war. Its culture of dialogue, if properly utilized and applied to contemporary situation, will surely help minimize the bloody conflicts that are raging in all parts of the globe. Mechanisms for peace devised by Islam, such as the provisions of amaan, isti’maan, sulh and muhadanah, if allowed to work, will put an end to war and ensure just peace, and the much sought-after but elusive international security will finally be ours. They may even save humanity from the catastrophe of nuclear war.