Lahore: A Pakistani court on Sunday acquitted all 115 suspects accused of torching a number of houses and shops of Christians in Lahore in 2013 over a blasphemy issue, citing lack of evidence.
Lahore’s anti-terrorism court judge Chaudhry Muhammad Azam accepted the arguments of defence and ordered acquittal of the suspects, observing that evidence presented by prosecution against the suspects was “insufficient” to convict them.
On March 8, 2013, thousands of protesters armed with sticks, clubs and stones ransacked Joseph Colony and set over 125 residential properties, shops as well as some motorcycles and rickshaws and a church on fire after a word was spread in the locality that a Christian had committed blasphemy.
A clash between police and the arsonists had also left a number of people injured but no casualty was reported.
During Sunday’s hearing, Defence lawyer Ghulam Murtaza argued that the prosecution had failed to provide a “single evidence” to establish the charges against his clients.
He said the prosecution had lingered the case for more than three years but could not come up with any solid evidence against the suspects. He requested the court to acquit the suspects because of want for proof.
A prosecution lawyer argued the evidence provided by the prosecution team is enough to convict the suspects.
“This incident not only spread a wave of terrorism in Lahore but also brought a bad to name to Pakistan,” he said.
The judge, however, termed the evidence “insufficient” and acquitted all the suspects.
Hundreds of Christians were displaced following the incident. Initially police had booked more than 1,000 Muslims, 80 of them were nominated. Later, it arrested 115 suspects who were acquitted on Sunday.
Police had also arrested a Christian, who was accused of blasphemy. A trial court had tried him under blasphemy charges and sentenced him to death in 2014.
Imran Shahid had accused Sawan Masih of making blasphemous remarks.
However, Dilawar Masih, who lost his house and shop in the attack, said, “Both Imran and Sawan are close friends and the former has made the allegation only to settle a personal score because they had quarrelled over some petty matter.”