NRIs Corner

US court favours Sikh religious rights in armed forces

US court favours Sikh religious rights in armed forces

Upholding the religious freedom rights of Sikhs in the US armed forces, an American court has ruled in favour of a decorated Sikh US Army Captain who had demanded that the military accommodate his articles of faith and abandon its impromptu discriminatory testing.

Captain Simratpal Singh, 28, in a lawsuit filed against the US Department of Defence demanded the US military accommodate his articles of faith and dump the discriminatory testing. “Thousands of other soldiers are permitted to wear long hair and beards for medical or other reasons, without being subjected to such specialised and costly expert testing of their helmets and gas masks,” Judge Beryl A Howell swiftly ruled in Captain Singh’s favour on Thursday.

The US Department of Defence, which had granted and then extended Captain Singh’s temporary religious accommodation until March 31 this year, remains scheduled to make a final decision on Singh’s permanent accommodation by that deadline. Captain Singh, who is a West Point graduate, Ranger, and Bronze Star Medal recipient, has successfully passed the safety tests required of his unit.

“The US Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act make it crystal clear that Captain Singh’s right to practice his faith and serve in our military are not mutually exclusive,” said Amandeep Sidhu, partner at law firm McDermott Will & Emery that represented Captain Singh.

“We are grateful that the court is on the right side of religious freedom with its ruling, which begs the question: Does the world’s largest employer really want to be on the wrong side of history?” he said.

The testing that the military planned to impose on Captain Singh is not required of any other soldiers, even the tens of thousands with medical or religious accommodations, and including previously accommodated Sikhs, he said. Given that Captain Singh has passed the standard safety tests, further testing would clearly be discriminatory, he claimed.