Chennai

Tirupparankundram Deepam issue given a mischievous political spin: Madras HC

The Bench suggested permitting five persons named by the court to offer symbolic prayers for 15 minutes near the stone pillar.

Madurai: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday, March 3, remarked that Minerals and Mines Minister S Regupathy had “given a mischievous political spin” to the Tirupparankundram issue when he stated that the government would not permit the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam at the Deepathoon (stone pillar).

Hearing a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an earlier direction on lighting Karthigai Deepam atop the Deepathoon, the Bench comprising Justice G R Swaminathan said, “Regupathy has given a mischievous political spin to the turn of events. Whether the issuance of a prohibitory order by the Madurai collector is an act of contempt or not is the subject matter of court proceedings. The rule of sub-judice will kick in. Let the minister bear this principle in mind.”

The judge closed a sub-application seeking to initiate contempt proceedings against Regupathy for his reported statements on the issue. Justice Swaminathan made it clear that he would not hesitate to reopen the sub-application if the occasion demanded.

Madurai collector K J Praveen Kumar had filed an additional affidavit stating that he promulgated the prohibition orders on December 1, 2025, in order to prevent a law and order situation and not to hinder temple authorities from enforcing the high court’s orders to light the lamp at the stone pillar.

The Bench suggested permitting five persons named by the court to offer symbolic prayers for 15 minutes near the stone pillar atop the Tirupparankundram hill. “I further indicate that this entire exercise can be confined to 15 minutes. This is only a suggestion and not a direction,” he added.

It said the symbolic prayers (not lighting the lamp) could be allowed if the government wanted to show respect to the earlier orders of the court.

The court observed that the police “took shelter” behind the collector’s prohibitory order and made it clear that they were only enforcing the collector’s order.

The judge adjourned further hearing on the case to March 4.

(With PTI inputs)

This post was last modified on March 3, 2026 3:51 pm

Share
News Desk

NewsDesk is our dedicated team of multimedia journalists at Siasat.com, delivering round-the-clock coverage of breaking news and events worldwide. As your trusted news source, NewsDesk provides verified updates on politics, business, current affairs, and more. Stay informed with live blogs and comprehensive reports on key developments across India and around the globe.

Load more...