Andhra govt to ban social media for children under 13 in 90 days

In 2025, Australia became the first country to ban social media for children under 16.

Amaravati: Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on Friday said social media will be prohibited for children below 13 years of age, within the next 90 days, in the state.

Addressing the assembly, the Chief Minister said they are debating whether to extend this ban to children between 13 and 16 years of age.

“Definitely, we will make sure that within 90 days those below 13 years of age are not able to use social media,” said Naidu.

Social media for teenagers between 13 and 16 years

The CM said his government will take a call on banning social media for teenagers between 13 and 16 years.

Referring to the alleged Tirupati laddu ghee adulteration issue, Naidu said, “Venkateswara Swamy laddu was desecrated. This is not an ordinary crime. It was a deliberate conspiracy,” he said.

During an NDA legislative party meeting in the southern state in 2024, Naidu had alleged that the previous YSRCP government did not even spare the Venkateswara temple and used substandard ingredients and animal fats for making laddus, which are revered and sought after by crores of devotees.

MS Admissions 2026-27

“That party (YSRCP) doesn’t seem to have realised it, and there was no answer when Sri Venkateswara Swamy was allegedly desecrated,” said Naidu.

The CM criticised YSRCP chief YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, saying he showed a lack of remorse over the controversy.

He emphasised that true democracy requires respecting the customs and traditions of religious institutions.

Despite the controversy surrounding the sanctity of the Tirupati temple, he highlighted a surge in religious tourism.

“The state’s temples have seen a rise in footfalls, logging a growth of up to 70 per cent,” he added.

Social media ban for children below 16 years in Karnataka

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Friday announced a ban on use of social media for those under the age of 16 years, aimed at preventing its adverse effects on children.

Though a cross-section of parents welcomed the move, they are wary of the practicality of its implementation.

“With the objective of preventing adverse effects of increasing mobile usage on children, usage of social media will be banned for children under the age of 16,” Siddaramaiah said while presenting the state Budget for 2026-27 here.

However, he did not elaborate on how this will be implemented.

In January this year, Karnataka Minister for Electronics, IT/BT Priyank Kharge had informed the Legislative Assembly that the state government was holding consultations regarding measures to be put in place for responsible use of artificial intelligence and social media, especially among children.

The central government’s Economic Survey tabled in Parliament in January this year said age-based access to online platforms should be considered while also cutting down online teaching to avoid digital addiction.

Manohar N H, a resident of Jalahalli in Bengaluru who has two school-going children — a 16-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl — said that restricting social media for children below 16 may be good in some ways, but implementing it would be difficult.

“These days, teaching in many schools and colleges happens through apps. For instance, SSLC and PUC students—especially those in second PUC—already rely heavily on apps for classes and communication. Controlling social media use will be very challenging, particularly in government schools and colleges. The rule may be introduced, but I doubt it will succeed; the success rate may be only around 10 per cent,” he said.

Appreciating the move, Dr Saritha Nagaraj, Consultant – Psychology and Child Development, Motherhood Hospital here said with this the risk of poor mental health among children and teenagers — including symptoms of depression, anxiety, poor sleep, and body image issues arising from unhealthy comparisons, which can further lead to disordered eating — will be reduced.

“Their cognitive performance and emotional regulation are also likely to improve. Exposure to dangerous content will decrease, and this could help improve attention span as well as academic performance,” she added.

Dr Rakshay Shetty, Clinical Director, Pediatric Services Head, Pediatric Intensive Care Services, Rainbow Children’s Hospital said that while there are a lot of disadvantages of excess use of mobile devices in children, considering its ill-effects on their psychology, at the same time it provides a lot of practical utility for parents, teachers and children.

“We need to look at a balanced solution because a blanket ban can be counterproductive since implementing it is not practical and it might remain like a paper tiger where there is a rule but no one follows it. Instead, giving guidelines on how to practically use mobile devices and limit their excess use would be more practical,” he said.

More than the government, the role of parents is important in monitoring children, understanding the harms of excess mobile use, cyber bullying and addiction to online games, and protecting them, he added.

BJP Rajya Sabha MP Lahar Singh Siroya, however, welcomed the move in a social media post on ‘X’ saying he had raised this issue via a special mention in parliament.

“Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi had also spoken about securing the interest of our younger generations at the AI summit, recently. I had further asked for restrictions on smartphone use among children in my parliament speech. I hope this too will be looked into seriously,” he said.

Upasna Dash, Founder and CEO, Jajabor Brand Consultancy said this move is likely to have ripple effects across the ecosystem and change the way advertisers access this age group.

However, it is important to recognise that brands and products targeting this demographic existed long before social media, with many cult brands in the 1990s built through word of mouth and different forms of advertising, she said.

“In that sense, while social media has become a dominant channel, communication with this audience has always taken multiple forms. What we may see now is a shift back to some of those approaches, including word of mouth, offline marketing, and brand insertions within broader content,” Dash added.

Aparajita Bharti, Founding Partner at the Quantum Hub expressed that a social media ban however is unlikely to have the desired effect in India given the high incidence of shared device usage in households. Further, it is also an imperfect measure, given that it is hard to define ‘social media’ and the assumption that only a certain kind of platforms are harmful for children is not grounded in evidence.

“The government in India should take a more nuanced view of the issue as we have a huge digital divide, which often impact young people help bridge it. Regulation must focus on making the entire internet safe for children rather than focusing on just one type of platforms, as AI and gaming related harms are also becoming evident,” she said.

In 2025, Australia became the first country to ban social media for children under 16 by blocking access to platforms including TikTok, YouTube and Instagram and Facebook.

Indonesia has also banned social media for children under the age of 16.

Press Trust of India

Press Trust of India (PTI) is India’s premier news agency, having a reach as vast as the Indian Railways. It employs more than 400 journalists and 500 stringers to cover… More »
Back to top button