New Delhi: The Congress on Monday, December 11, demanded immediate restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir and said assembly elections should be held there immediately to enable people to elect a government of their choice.
The party’s reaction came after the SC unanimously upheld the Centre’s decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 that bestowed special status on the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir and directed restoration of statehood “at the earliest” as well as elections to the assembly by September 30 next year.
Congress leaders P Chidambaram and Abhishek Singhvi said the judgment of the Supreme Court in cases concerning the abrogation of Article 370 has decided many issues but left some.
The judgment needs a careful study, Chidambaram said, noting that “prima facie, we respectfully disagree with judgment on the manner in which Art. 370 was abrogated.”
He said the Congress has always demanded the restoration of full statehood for J and K, and “we welcome the SC verdict in this regard.”.
“Full statehood must be restored immediately. The aspirations of the people of Ladakh must also be fulfilled. We welcome the SC direction to hold assembly elections. However, we believe elections should be held immediately, and there is no reason to wait until September 30, 2024,” the senior Congress leader said.
“When elections are held, the people of J&K will have the opportunity to express their views on the crucial questions that we debated in the SC. This is an opportunity that has been denied to them so far,” he said.
“We are also disappointed that SC did not decide the question of dismembering the state and reducing its status to two union territories. That question is being reserved for adjudication in a suitable case in the future,” he said.
Singhvi also said that the Supreme Court verdict is the law of the land now, and the debate on the issue has now come to an end. “Democracy, and not autocracy, is the demand of every citizen of Jammu and Kashmir. Why is the BJP afraid of an elected government?” Singhvi asked.
Ending a decades-long debate, a five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, delivered three concurring judgments upholding abrogation of the constitutional schemes that provided special status to Jammu and Kashmir when it was annexed to the Union of India in 1947.
Writing the judgment for himself and Justices B. R. Gavai and Surya Kant, the CJI said Article 370 was a temporary provision and the president was empowered to revoke it in the absence of the Constituent Assembly of the erstwhile state.
The Supreme Court verdict is a “resounding declaration of hope, progress, and unity for our sisters and brothers in J&K, Ladakh,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said.
Follow on Twitter | Posted by Arsalan Nazir | 
